Strategic Initiatives
11201 stories
·
45 followers

L.A. “Protest” Is not Organic—It's Organized

1 Share
  • Organized, Not Organic: The Los Angeles unrest is described as a calculated civil terrorism movement, not a spontaneous protest.

  • Symbolic Gear: The prevalent use of keffiyehs and identical gear suggests coordination among the participants.

  • Logistical Support: The large quantity of gas masks and coordinated acts of violence like rock-throwing and arson point to organization and planning.

  • Globalization of Intifada: Connections to groups like Students for Justice in Palestine suggest the unrest is linked to a broader anti-Western agenda.

  • Misleading Media: Some media outlets are accused of mischaracterizing the events as peaceful protests rather than acts of lawlessness.

  • Strategic Intimidation: The author posits that these organized acts of violence aim to make immigration law enforcement a contentious issue.


Tal Fortgang

Nothing About the L.A. “Protest” Is Organic

How did the rioters know to show up covering their faces with the same symbolic gear?
/ Eye on the News / Public Safety, Politics and Law
Jun 11 2025 / Share
The new dominant form of organized crime has shown its face in Los Angeles in recent days. Though it comes under the banner of “protest” and is whitewashed in the media as “mostly peaceful” and presumed spontaneous, a close observer can see that it is none of these things. It is in fact the result of a calculated civil terrorism movement taking advantage of Americans’ reluctance to treat criminals as criminals.
Images and videos from the riots give the game away. Why are there keffiyehs everywhere? What does Palestinianism have to do with preventing the federal government from enforcing immigration law, and how did the rioters know to show up covering their faces with the same symbolic gear? Who brought gas masks by the truckload? Who managed to convince hundreds of people to take up rock-throwing, Molotov cocktail-dropping, and arson at seemingly arbitrary places and times? Who laid the groundwork for street violence by training people in the tactics that prevent law enforcement from ending it promptly? As domestic-extremism expert Kyle Shideler puts it, this violence is “not black magic, it’s just hard work.”
Finally, a reason to check your email.
Sign up for our free newsletter today.
But just as it is not black magic—not orchestrated down to fine details by mob bosses—neither is it grassroots. Nothing about this “protest” is organic. It is organized, activated, and AstroTurfed—and it has a hard time sticking to script. When Students for Justice in Palestine chimes in to say that “from the barrios of LA to the refugee camps of Bethlehem, we will globalize the intifada,” it makes the unrest look less like an expression of outrage against immigration policy than a lashing out against the rule of law itself.
It will still cloak itself in the language of law and democracy. It gets significant help from credulous media reporting, like CNN’s claim that “protests in and around Los Angeles erupted on Friday after federal immigration agents arrested at least 44 people.” A protest is when people peaceably assemble for a redress of grievances. What has transpired in Los Angeles is wanton property destruction, assaults on cops, and exuberant lawlessness.
None of this stands any chance of showing the American people that the government’s actions are wrong and the “protesters” are right. All it can do is show that the rioters are loose cannons, and that Americans ought to be afraid of what they might do. It is the opposite of democratic.
Strategically deployed acts of intimidation are the mechanism by which civil terror groups—themselves strategic, organized, well-funded, and cleverer than they look—seek to advance their anti-Western cause. One would have to be naive, at this point, not to suspect that they want to make immigration law enforcement a third rail in American politics.
For those who openly seek to “globalize the intifada”—the guerrilla campaign against civilians in the “Little Satan,” Israel—lax immigration standards provide an excellent way to amass manpower for the burgeoning struggle against the “Great Satan,” America. While no hard evidence demonstrates Iran’s involvement in fomenting this organized chaos, civil terror groups do use Tehran’s terms and those of its proxies for other acts of terror. All appear to view the two nations in the same way.
Is the mass criminal activity we’re seeing in cities a foreign-funded effort to destabilize our politics, intimidate Americans to subvert the democratic process, and prevent the federal government from carrying out entirely justifiable immigration law enforcement? It’s hard to say definitively without further investigation. So long as these miscreants continue to act lawlessly, however, states and the federal government will have ample cause to open those investigations—to identify who is laying the groundwork for violence, which large nonprofits should face massive asset forfeitures for bankrolling civil terrorism, and which individuals should be facing prison time for bringing the new wave of organized crime to American streets.
Tal Fortgang is a legal policy fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
Top Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images
/ Donate
City Journal is a publication of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research (MI), a leading free-market think tank. Are you interested in supporting the magazine? As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, donations in support of MI and City Journal are fully tax-deductible as provided by law (EIN #13-2912529).
We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
City Journal Comment Policy
Topical and respectful comments are welcome. All comments will be held for pre-moderation.
0 Ratings
0.0
5
4
3
2
1
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
-
-
Related Articles
Read the whole story
bogorad
55 minutes ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Who Really is to Blame for Anti-Deportation Riots?

1 Share
  • Central Argument: Federal Judge James Boasberg is blamed for initiating anti-deportation riots through his rulings that hindered enforcement of the Alien Enemies Act.

  • Initial Ruling Impact: Judge Boasberg's swift actions, including an immediate ban on deportation of individuals covered by the AEA and an order to return already-departed planes, are seen as key in sparking the unrest.

  • Spread of Influence: Boasberg's status as chief judge and his connections are highlighted, suggesting his rulings emboldened other judges across the country to issue similar orders blocking deportations.

  • Consequence of Judicial Actions: The actions of these judges are presented as undermining the president's authority on immigration and national security, contributing to the current lawlessness and riots.

  • Specific Examples: The article cites specific cases where judges intervened to stop deportations, including a Venezuelan crime racket member, a man accused of trafficking, and relatives of an attempted firebomber, to illustrate the broader trend.


Discussion about this post

Well done, Julie K! It is pure insanity that US federal judge act to protect the so-called “rights” of illegal criminal aliens over US citizens!! And, all supported by the DemocRATic party!
Expand full comment
Great info, Julie!👍👍 I’m hopeful that the judges like Jimmy BoBo will be smacked down, though I fear the damage done by this lunatic and his fellow loons will last quite a while. They have damaged their own credibility, along with that of the broader judicial system. Any normal person with a shred of common sense understands the depravity of these judges, causing these normal people to be skeptical of the entire system.
This is on top of the persecution of political enemies pursued by whomever was in charge of the Biden administration. It’s springtime on the farm and that’s when an entire winter’s worth of manure must be removed. This feels like a particularly large pile of 🐂💩
Expand full comment
62 more comments...
Ready for more?
Read the whole story
bogorad
56 minutes ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Bill Ackman on X: "Some have criticized @RobertKennedyJr ACIP members appointments as being unqualified because they deem some to be ‘vaccine skeptics,’ a nomenclature they use, for example, to describe @MartinKulldorff. Kulldorff is a epidemiologist that co-authored the Great Barrington" / X

1 Share
  • Criticism: Some view ACIP member appointments, including Martin Kulldorff, as unqualified due to perceived 'vaccine skepticism.'

  • Great Barrington Declaration (GBD): Co-authored by Kulldorff, the GBD proposed focused protection for vulnearable during COVID-19 and normalcy for healthy individuals, which is now seen as a superior approach.

  • Vaccine Assessment: Vaccines have both benefits and risks, requiring careful weighing for different groups and ages.

  • ACIP Panel Composition: A panel with members willing to challenge conventional wisdom is more likely to reach accurate conclusions than one solely of 'vaccine enthusiasts.'

  • Vaccine Impact: Vaccines have saved many lives but also caused harm to some.


Some have criticized ACIP members appointments as being unqualified because they deem some to be ‘vaccine skeptics,’ a nomenclature they use, for example, to describe . Kulldorff is a epidemiologist that co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration that recommended focused protection for the most vulnerable and a return to normalcy for young healthy children and others in light of the vastly different risk of COVID to the young and healthy and the other health economic and societal risks to the then prevailing global lockdown approach in October 2020. The GBD was an extremely important contribution to the COVID discussion that was widely derided at the time, but in retrospect appears to have been a vastly superior approach to dealing with Covid. Like other drugs, vaccines offer benefits alongside risks that must be carefully weighed in order for a proper risk reward assessment to be made about their use in different populations, the age at which they are administered, and other relevant considerations. An ACIP panel that includes individuals who have shown a willingness to challenge conventional wisdom on vaccines and other health measures is more likely to get to the truth than one solely comprised of ‘vaccine enthusiasts.’ Vaccines have saved millions of lives, while also causing enormous harm to some. new ACIP panel can help advance our thinking on vaccine use and thereby help restore confidence that has been lost in our health institutions by an objective and careful review of vaccine policy. RFK is on the right track and he should be applauded for his efforts here.
Read the whole story
bogorad
59 minutes ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

New Army Reserve Unit Enlists Tech Executives From Meta, Palantir - WSJ

1 Share
  • New Army program: Silicon Valley tech executives are joining a new U.S. Army Reserve program focused on bringing tech upgrades.

  • Inaugural cohort: The first group includes chief technology officers from Palantir and Meta Platforms, along with OpenAI alumni.

  • Stated mission: The executives will serve part-time to assist the Army with technology advancements.

  • Shifting relationship: The program highlights a deepening relationship between the Pentagon and the tech industry.

  • Service commitment: Participants will serve about 120 hours per year as lieutenant colonels, with some flexibility in their duties.


Read the whole story
bogorad
59 minutes ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

U.N. Fudges the Data on West Bank Violence - WSJ

1 Share
  • Data Scrutiny: A report by Regavim challenges U.N. OCHA data on West Bank violence, alleging it includes non-violent incidents in its count of violent settler events.

  • Incident Inclusion: The U.N. data reportedly includes activities such as visits to the Temple Mount, archaeological site visits, and even traffic accidents as 'settler violence'.

  • Questionable Victims: The U.N. count of alleged violent incidents includes Palestinians harmed while engaging in terrorist attacks and cases where the victim's involvement in clashes is noted.

  • Blame on Security Forces: In some instances counted as 'settler violence' by the U.N., the report indicates that Israeli security forces, not settlers, were responsible.

  • Contrast with Palestinian Attacks: Israeli data from Shin Bet records a significantly higher number of serious attacks by Palestinians against Israeli civilians compared to the filtered 'settler violence' incidents.


Read the whole story
bogorad
13 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Los Angeles riots may encourage illegal immigrants to self-deport - Washington Examiner

1 Share
  • Presidential Approval: President Trump's job approval rating has recovered and is near 50%, comparable to Obama and G.W. Bush at a similar point in their second terms.

  • Military Recruitment: Under the new Defense Secretary, the Army met its FY2025 recruiting goal early, which the author suggests may be linked to Trump's rhetoric attracting un-woke young people.

  • Trade with China: China's exports to the U.S. in May were the lowest since February 2020, possibly influenced by Trump's trade policies and rhetoric.

  • Labor Market: May job numbers increased by more than expected, despite a significant drop in foreign-born workers since March.

  • Self-Deportation: The events in Los Angeles, including the handling of protests against ICE activity and the federal response, may encourage illegal immigrants to consider "self-deportation."

  • Public Opinion on Immigration: Polls indicate public approval of Trump's deportation program and show that many voters feel Democrats lack a clear plan on immigration.


“How’m I doin’?” the late New York Mayor Ed Koch used to ask constituents on his travels through the city. President Donald Trump, in the opinion of most Americans, is doin’ pretty well.
His job approval, which jutted downward after he announced his “liberation day” tariffs on April 2, has recovered and hovers just below 50%. That’s just about the level of Barack Obama’s and George W. Bush’s approval at this point in their second terms and above his own approval at any point in his first term.
Many continue to regard some top appointments as eccentric. His style of discourse, OFTEN IN ALL CAPS, is eccentric by any past presidential standard. But in a political system that remains democratic and is increasingly demotic, that which sounds coarse to you (and me) is apparently acceptable to most people. 
As for his, um, unusual appointments, they may make sense for a president who is less interested in fine-tuning organizations than in affecting the behaviors of mass publics. 
Candidate Donald Trump in 2024 promised that he would eliminate shortfalls in military recruitment, which he attributed to the Biden Pentagon’s “woke” policies. He pointed out accurately that the Army and Navy fell short of recruitment goals by as much as 25% in fiscal years 2022 and 2023
As defense secretary, he named Fox News host and military veteran Pete Hegseth, saying he’d promote a warfighting ethos that would attract un-woke young men and women to join up. The Army raised its recruiting goal from 55,000 to 61,000 and reached it in May, four months early
Maybe that’s a coincidence or a response to other factors. But it looks like Trump’s rhetoric made a big difference.
Or look at trade. Trump has made no secret of his love for tariffs and his desire to reduce trade with China. This week, the Wall Street Journal reported that China’s exports to the U.S. in May were the lowest since Covid-wracked February 2020. It looks like thousands of American and Chinese market participants have made new decisions in response to Trump’s rhetoric. 
Meanwhile, the May job numbers in the U.S. increased by a more-than-expected 139,000, despite a 60,000 reduction in federal jobs since January. And despite a drop of foreign-born workers in the labor market estimated between 773,000 and 1,000,000 since March. 
Three-quarters of a million to a million — those numbers dwarf the number of annual deportations from the interior of the U.S. as compiled by my Washington Examiner colleague Conn Carroll
Those range from 65,000 in the last year of the Obama administration and from 28,000 to 47,000 in the four Biden years. They were higher, 81,000 to 95,000, in the first three years of Trump I and then fell to 62,000 in Covid year 2020. 
These numbers put in perspective the drama that has been playing out in Los Angeles this past week. The Trump administration cannot expect that it can, logistically, remove all the untold millions of illegal immigrants that whoever was running the Biden administration (no one, including the authors of Original Sin, has disclosed just who that was) allowed into the U.S. But splashy raids and deportations can get hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of illegal immigrants thinking about what Mitt Romney in 2012 called “self-deportation.”
Which is probably happening thanks to what has been happening in Los Angeles these past five days. Demonstrations against ICE deportation activity resulted in the arrest of the head of the SEIU, the big government employees’ union. When “sanctuary city” Mayor Karen Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) let the rioting go on, Trump nationalized the California National Guard and dispatched Marines. 
He plainly had the authority to do so when federal law enforcement is blocked, and as my Washington Examiner colleague Byron York recounts. And the Supreme Court in 2012 made it clear that federal immigration law prevails over countervailing state law. 
There’s no question whose side the public is on. A pre-riot CBS poll showed 54% approving of Trump’s deportation program, and two polls taken this week showed approval, Insider Advantage by 59% to 39%, and the Napolitan News poll by 58% to 36%
After eight years of stark contrast between Trump and Democrats’ policies, as CNN poll analyst Harry Enten points out, most voters give Trump high marks and “believe that Democrats don’t have a clue on the issue of immigration.” 
Similarly, voters who remember Democrats’ insistence and journalists’ assurances that Joe Biden was fully functional are skeptical that the L.A. rioters were “overwhelmingly peaceful” (Kamala Harris) or “largely peaceful” (the New York Times).
There’s ample historic precedent for Trump’s action as well. President Eisenhower in 1957 and President Johnson in 1965 sent in federal troops to uphold federal law over the opposition of Democratic governors in Arkansas and Alabama.
Those governors were defying federal law for a cause, preservation of racial segregation, that the vast majority of voters, after a decade of reflection, were determined to reject. Today’s California Democrats are defying federal law for a cause, permanent amnesty for illegal immigrants, which it appears that voters, after a decade of reflection, are bent on rejecting as well. 
As for the illegal immigrants themselves, I’m not aware that anyone has conducted a poll of them, or could, since people in their situation are wary of being interviewed. But as the workforce numbers suggest, for many, self-deportation, together perhaps with the Department of Homeland Security’s $1,000 travel stipend, is looking like a good option. One that may be taken up by many more than are legally deported.  
So “how’s he doin”? Better, perhaps, than his critics think.

Who do you believe is most responsible for the ongoing violence in Los Angeles?

Poll ends in 5 days • Vote below
  • The individuals committing violent acts.
  • State officials like Newsom who oppose federal intervention.
  • The federal government and their enforcement strategies.
  • Activists and their influence on the situation.
2120 votes
2 comments
v.11.1.6
Read the whole story
bogorad
19 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories