Strategic Initiatives
11132 stories
·
45 followers

Why can't Piers Morgan handle the truth about Israel? | The Spectator

1 Share
  • Accusation of Censorship: The author claims to have been censored on Piers Morgan Uncensored for questioning the narrative around the conflict.

  • Dissemination of Disinformation: The author criticizes the media for spreading misinformation and falsehoods about Israel.

  • Incident Regarding AI Imagery: The author was rebuked for questioning the use of artificially generated imagery in a story about the deaths of children in Gaza.

  • Piers Morgan's Conduct: The author accuses Piers Morgan of unprofessional conduct and of being part of the problem of disinformation.

  • Historical Context: The author links Morgan's current behavior on his show to his past actions as editor of the Daily Mirror, where he published fake images.


As Israel continues to wage a defensive war against the terrorists who invaded and slaughtered hundreds of Jews on October 7, the Jewish State is under attack as never before in the West. I found this out for myself when I was invited on to Piers Morgan Uncensored to discuss the situation in Gaza.

What my appearance and censorship on the ironically named “Uncensored” show demonstrated was a refusal, perhaps even a fear, to hear the reality, the facts and the law when it comes to the war against Hamas. This is in stark contrast to the disinformation and falsehoods about Israel that have been freely disseminated on that show – and elsewhere in the media – by those who oppose Israel.

My crime was to suggest that we should wait for an investigation to take place into the alleged deaths of a number of children in Gaza. On May 23, the home of two doctors and their children was reportedly hit by an Israeli air strike. Several children, we’re told, died in the raid. Yet when I called into question why artificially-generated imagery was used to promote this story, I was shouted down. Here’s the full exchange:

Piers Morgan: Wait a minute, you don’t believe that those children were killed?

Natasha Hausdorff: I have seen conflicting accounts and I want that story to be properly investigated…

PM: Wow.

NH: –before the international media runs with it.

PM: You think those two parents — one of whom, I think, operated on one of the children — you think that those two doctors, the parents, they just made it up–

NH: Why are those children there?

PM: –that nine of their 10 children had been blown to pieces by an Israeli air strike?

NH: If this is true–

PM: You don’t believe it?

NH: Why on earth was artificially-generated imagery used to promote this story when it first happened? We’ve seen time and time again–

PM: I gotta say, I think what you’ve just said about that family is despicable. I’m sorry. It’s despicable.

Being interrupted and harangued, or even having my volume turned down or line cut, is not a new experience for me in “interviews”. It has always been a clear indication that the individuals involved in this unprofessional conduct were out of their depth and at a loss as to how to engage with the evidence I had presented. Nor, indeed, am I the only one experiencing such treatment. Any individual who does not subscribe to the virulently anti-Israel agenda, and who is asked to comment on broadcast media, will have experienced similar playground antics. It is demonstrative of a catastrophic failure by the media to do its job and an abject absence of journalistic integrity.

The pathetic display this week by Piers Morgan demonstrates that he is a significant part of the problem of disinformation about this conflict. Morgan should be well aware that there have been repeated stories emerging from Gaza which have subsequently been debunked only after they spread around the world. The predictable result has been the poisoning of many minds against Israel, on the basis of fabrications and blood libels. My simple entreaty was that the matter should not be prejudged, especially where fake AI generated images had been deployed to support it. Cue frenzied outrage and bile from Morgan.

Defence of fake images in pursuit of a “good story” is, of course, old ground for Morgan. He was dismissed from his role as editor of the Daily Mirror in 2004, following the publication of photographs that purportedly showed British soldiers abusing Iraqi detainees in Abu Ghraib. The images were later determined to be staged and not taken in Iraq. Morgan stood by their publication and refused to issue an apology on the basis there was no firm evidence that they were fake, though the newspaper did, acknowledging that it had been the victim of a “calculated and malicious hoax” and expressing deep regret for the reputational damage caused to the British Army. Morgan’s defence of his decision to publish those fake pictures stemmed from his opposition to the Iraq war in a disgraceful example of “the ends justify the means”.

Did he learn anything from that shameful incident? The way I was treated on Uncensored suggests not. At least when Morgan was in the employ of a national newspaper, he could be held accountable. But this no longer appears to be the case. He is now free to shout down his guests without consequence.

The problem doesn’t stop with Morgan. The unfair way in which Israel is presented in the Western media, and the refusal to treat Hamas’s claims with scepticism, misleads the public. It increases the threat of violence to Jews around the world, but also, crucially, props up and encourages Hamas, thereby prolonging the war and the suffering of Israelis and Palestinians alike.

Read the whole story
bogorad
2 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

How the Media Manufactured a ‘Genocide’ - Tablet Magazine

1 Share
  • The article examines: How the media's usage of the term 'genocide' in the context of the Israel-Gaza conflict surpasses its usage in discussions of actual genocides.

  • The author highlights: The concept of "concept creep," where morally charged terms expand beyond their original meanings, becoming politically weaponized.

  • The study reveals: That mentions of "genocide" in major news outlets, like the New York Times, have reached unprecedented levels in relation to the Israel-Gaza conflict.

  • The author argues: That this framing is not due to ignorance or bias but is a purposeful effort to delegitimize Israel's actions.

  • The article concludes: By emphasizing the importance of maintaining the clarity and gravity of terms like "genocide" to accurately identify and respond to actual instances.


Read the whole story
bogorad
4 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Giant Russian Nuke Info Hack « Lawrence Person's BattleSwarm Blog

1 Share
  • A security breach: Exposed details about Russia’s expanding nuclear weapons program.

  • Leaked documents: Included blueprints and procurement lists from Russian military construction projects.

  • Western companies: Supplied materials used to expand Russia’s nuclear weapons bases, including Knauf.

  • New facilities: Have been built across Russia, with infrastructure upgrades and new missile silos.

  • Procurement data: Reveals how Russia bypasses Western sanctions through intermediaries.


In an under-reported story, a treasure trove of information about Russia’s nuclear weapon infrastructure has been hacked and released.

A massive security breach has exposed terrifying details about Russia’s rapidly expanding nuclear weapons programme, including what experts say is a significant advance in hypersonic missile technology. Documents obtained and analysed by German magazine Der Spiegel and Danish investigative outlet Danwatch reveal that Western companies—including the German gypsum manufacturer Knauf—are supplying materials used to expand Russia’s secretive nuclear weapons bases.

The leaked files include detailed blueprints and procurement lists from Russian military construction projects, providing rare insight into the infrastructure behind Moscow’s nuclear arsenal. Among the materials specified are cement, plaster, adhesives, insulation, and cladding, many supplied by Western firms. Knauf, based in Iphofen, Bavaria, features prominently. Although the company has publicly distanced itself from its Russian operations, the documents show it still controls its Russian subsidiaries.

At one point, one of these subsidiaries was even classified as “systemically important” within Vladimir Putin’s economy, underlining the company’s continued strategic role in supplying construction materials vital to Russia’s military build-up.

The documents detail construction at the nuclear base near Yasnyj, featuring blueprints for watchtowers and military facilities. European military experts confirmed some sites—including Yasnyj—have been equipped with Russia’s Avangard system, a hypersonic glide vehicle designed to evade missile defences by manoeuvring at extreme speeds.

Like all Russia’s hypersonic missiles, I have grave doubts that Avangard (first announced in 2019) comes anywhere near its Wunderwaffen specs.

Satellite imagery analysed by Der Spiegel shows these sites have been modernised with reinforced structures, upgraded defences, and sensor technology, built from higher-grade materials than in previous decades.

New missile silos, designed to house around 900 strategic warheads, are better fortified and concealed.

The leaked procurement data also reveals how Russia is getting around Western sanctions. Direct deliveries from Germany to Russian defence entities are banned, but Russian buyers use intermediaries.

One example is a small firm in Yekaterinburg, which won a contract to buy Knauf plaster for the 368th regiment at Yasnyj.

A Knauf spokesperson told Der Spiegel: “The management of the Knauf Group and the Knauf family condemn Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.”

But evidently not enough to stop doing business with them.

The revelations come amid mounting concern over Russia’s expanding nuclear arsenal and the international implications of Moscow’s continued military modernisation despite sanctions.

As before, I continue to have doubts as to how much nuclear weapons modernization Russia can pay for. The United States is going to spend some $634 billion this decade maintaining its nuclear deterrent. The U.S. spends more money maintaining nuclear weapons in a given year than Russia spends annually on its entire military.

Danwatch has more information on the breach, but the top of the page is very slide-show heavy before you get to the meat at the bottom.

Danwatch, in collaboration with German Der Spiegel, can for the first time reveal previously unknown details about the enormous upgrade of the military infrastructure at Russia’s most protected facilities.

Together we have analyzed more than two million documents relating to Russian military procurement that Danwatch systematically retrieved from a public database over a period of many months. The Russian authorities have gradually restricted access to the database, but we managed to circumvent these restrictions by using a veriety of digital techniques, including a network of servers located in Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus.

Given computer security standards in most organizations, the idea that sensitive information was just sitting on a publicly accessible server for years at a time is entirely too plausible.

The documents reveal how numerous new facilities have been built across all of Russia: Entire bases have been almost leveled and rebuilt from the ground up; hundreds of new barracks, watchtowers, control centers and storage buildings have been erected; and several kilometers of underground tunnels have been excavated.

I can’t imagine that Putin is pleased that every nation in the world now has precise location targeting information for those sites…

Tags: Avangard, Foreign Policy, Germany, hacking, Military, nuclear weapons, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian War

Read the whole story
bogorad
4 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Live Updates: Trump Threatens to Cut Elon Musk's Government Contracts as Feud Escalates - The New York Times

1 Share
  • Trump's Criticism: President Trump expressed his disappointment in Elon Musk, who was previously a top presidential advisor.

  • Musk's Response: In response, Musk took credit for Trump's election victory and criticized the president's domestic policy bill.

  • Breakdown of the Partnership: The public rift follows a close partnership where Musk supported Trump's campaign with substantial financial contributions.

  • Musk's Actions: Musk has been critical of Republicans in Congress and now ridicules the president, leading to chaos on X.

  • Trump's Accusation: Trump accused Musk of "Trump derangement syndrome."

  • Summarizer Insight: The shift in the relationship between Trump and Musk, who has previously been a reliable source of support, marks a notable development, suggesting an emerging split within the Republican Party about domestic policies being pushed.


While meeting with Friedrich Merz, Germany’s new chancellor, in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump broke days of uncharacteristic silence and unloaded on Mr. Musk, who until last week was a top presidential adviser.

“I’m very disappointed in Elon,” Mr. Trump said. “I’ve helped Elon a lot.”

As the president criticized Mr. Musk, the billionaire responded in real time on X, the social media platform he owns.

“Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,” Mr. Musk wrote. “Such ingratitude,” he added, taking credit for Mr. Trump’s election in a way that he never has before.

By Thursday afternoon, Mr. Musk was floating leaving the Republican Party to form a new entity. Mr. Trump, for his part, was accusing him of “Trump derangement syndrome.”

Mr. Musk had been careful in recent days to train his ire on Republicans in Congress, not Mr. Trump himself. But he discarded that caution on Thursday, ridiculing the president in a pattern familiar to the many previous Trump advisers who have fallen out of favor.

Here’s what else to know:

  • A shattered alliance: The public break comes after a remarkable partnership between the two men. Mr. Musk deployed over $250 million to back Mr. Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign. After Mr. Trump won, he gave Mr. Musk free rein to slash the federal work force. Just last week, Mr. Trump gave Mr. Musk a personal send-off in the Oval Office, praising him as “one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced,” while Mr. Musk promised to remain a “friend and adviser to the president.”

  • Online chaos: Now unshackled from loyalty to the Trump party line, Mr. Musk has returned to fomenting chaos on X. Mr. Musk panned the president’s signature domestic policy bill as a “disgusting abomination” and telling House members who voted for it: “You know you did wrong.” Mr. Musk has often criticized legislation, agencies and others that are against the interests of himself and his companies, which include the electric carmaker Tesla and the rocket company SpaceX.

Kate Conger, Michael Gold and Jonathan Swan contributed reporting.

Read the whole story
bogorad
4 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Gemini 2.5 Pro: Access Google’s latest preview AI model

1 Share
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview: An upgraded preview of Gemini 2.5 Pro is introduced before its general availability.

  • Performance Boost: The model shows significant improvements in benchmarks, including a 24-point Elo score jump on LMArena and a 35-point jump on WebDevArena.

  • Coding and Reasoning: Gemini 2.5 Pro continues to excel in coding, leading on benchmarks like Aider Polyglot. It also achieves top-tier performance on GPQA and HLE.

  • Improved Output: The updated model addresses feedback, enhancing its style, structure, and formatting for more creative responses.

  • Availability: Developers can access the upgraded preview through the Gemini API via Google AI Studio and Vertex AI, with thinking budgets added. It's also rolling out in the Gemini app.

  • Summarizer Insight: The article highlights continued incremental improvements in Gemini's performance metrics and accessibility to developers, emphasizing a focus on practical improvements and developer tools.


Try the latest Gemini 2.5 Pro before general availability.

We’re introducing an upgraded preview of Gemini 2.5 Pro, our most intelligent model yet. Building on the version we released in May and showed at I/O, this model will be the generally available, stable version starting in a couple of weeks, ready for enterprise-scale applications.

The latest 2.5 Pro reflects a 24-point Elo score jump on LMArena, maintaining its lead on the leaderboard at 1470, and a 35-point Elo jump to lead on WebDevArena at 1443. It continues to excel at coding, leading on difficult coding benchmarks like Aider Polyglot. It also shows top-tier performance on GPQA and Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE), highly challenging benchmarks that evaluate a model’s math, science, knowledge and reasoning capabilities.

We also addressed feedback from our previous 2.5 Pro release, improving its style and structure — it can be more creative with better-formatted responses.

Developers can start building with the upgraded preview of 2.5 Pro in the Gemini API via Google AI Studio and Vertex AI — where we’ve also added thinking budgets to give developers more control over cost and latency. It’s also rolling out today in the Gemini app.

Read the whole story
bogorad
4 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Media Fail--Trump Tops Obama's Job Approval Rating

1 Share
More voters approve of the job Trump is doing than approved of the job Obama was doing on this same day.
Read the whole story
bogorad
13 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories