Strategic Initiatives
11203 stories
·
45 followers

Haneghbi: Khamenei and his people are Haman. There are no plans to kill them at

1 Comment
Haneghbi: Khamenei and his people are Haman. There are no plans to kill them at the moment.
Read the whole story
bogorad
5 hours ago
reply
https://x.com/i/grok/share/lABbZ6dlUfPNfgdyh5bCvQC8d
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Netanyahu takes his biggest gamble yet as Israel strikes Iran

1 Share
  • Israeli attacks: Israel launched a large-scale aerial assault on Iran, described as the most devastating blow since Saddam Hussein's invasion.

  • Targets: Israeli jets bombed military headquarters, officers' residences in Tehran, and the Natanz uranium enrichment facility.

  • Scale of operation: Approximately 200 Israeli warplanes conducted bombing raids across Iran, with potential for strikes to continue for weeks.

  • Political context: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu initiated the offensive, seen as a significant gamble amidst existing conflict in the region.

  • Iran's response: Iran's supreme leader warned of severe punishment, and reports indicate an initial response involved launching drones.

  • Regional implications: The strikes risk prolonged conflict across the Middle East, potentially involving US bases and Gulf states.


Read the whole story
bogorad
11 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

L.A. “Protest” Is not Organic—It's Organized

1 Share
  • Organized, Not Organic: The Los Angeles unrest is described as a calculated civil terrorism movement, not a spontaneous protest.

  • Symbolic Gear: The prevalent use of keffiyehs and identical gear suggests coordination among the participants.

  • Logistical Support: The large quantity of gas masks and coordinated acts of violence like rock-throwing and arson point to organization and planning.

  • Globalization of Intifada: Connections to groups like Students for Justice in Palestine suggest the unrest is linked to a broader anti-Western agenda.

  • Misleading Media: Some media outlets are accused of mischaracterizing the events as peaceful protests rather than acts of lawlessness.

  • Strategic Intimidation: The author posits that these organized acts of violence aim to make immigration law enforcement a contentious issue.


Tal Fortgang

Nothing About the L.A. “Protest” Is Organic

How did the rioters know to show up covering their faces with the same symbolic gear?
/ Eye on the News / Public Safety, Politics and Law
Jun 11 2025 / Share
The new dominant form of organized crime has shown its face in Los Angeles in recent days. Though it comes under the banner of “protest” and is whitewashed in the media as “mostly peaceful” and presumed spontaneous, a close observer can see that it is none of these things. It is in fact the result of a calculated civil terrorism movement taking advantage of Americans’ reluctance to treat criminals as criminals.
Images and videos from the riots give the game away. Why are there keffiyehs everywhere? What does Palestinianism have to do with preventing the federal government from enforcing immigration law, and how did the rioters know to show up covering their faces with the same symbolic gear? Who brought gas masks by the truckload? Who managed to convince hundreds of people to take up rock-throwing, Molotov cocktail-dropping, and arson at seemingly arbitrary places and times? Who laid the groundwork for street violence by training people in the tactics that prevent law enforcement from ending it promptly? As domestic-extremism expert Kyle Shideler puts it, this violence is “not black magic, it’s just hard work.”
Finally, a reason to check your email.
Sign up for our free newsletter today.
But just as it is not black magic—not orchestrated down to fine details by mob bosses—neither is it grassroots. Nothing about this “protest” is organic. It is organized, activated, and AstroTurfed—and it has a hard time sticking to script. When Students for Justice in Palestine chimes in to say that “from the barrios of LA to the refugee camps of Bethlehem, we will globalize the intifada,” it makes the unrest look less like an expression of outrage against immigration policy than a lashing out against the rule of law itself.
It will still cloak itself in the language of law and democracy. It gets significant help from credulous media reporting, like CNN’s claim that “protests in and around Los Angeles erupted on Friday after federal immigration agents arrested at least 44 people.” A protest is when people peaceably assemble for a redress of grievances. What has transpired in Los Angeles is wanton property destruction, assaults on cops, and exuberant lawlessness.
None of this stands any chance of showing the American people that the government’s actions are wrong and the “protesters” are right. All it can do is show that the rioters are loose cannons, and that Americans ought to be afraid of what they might do. It is the opposite of democratic.
Strategically deployed acts of intimidation are the mechanism by which civil terror groups—themselves strategic, organized, well-funded, and cleverer than they look—seek to advance their anti-Western cause. One would have to be naive, at this point, not to suspect that they want to make immigration law enforcement a third rail in American politics.
For those who openly seek to “globalize the intifada”—the guerrilla campaign against civilians in the “Little Satan,” Israel—lax immigration standards provide an excellent way to amass manpower for the burgeoning struggle against the “Great Satan,” America. While no hard evidence demonstrates Iran’s involvement in fomenting this organized chaos, civil terror groups do use Tehran’s terms and those of its proxies for other acts of terror. All appear to view the two nations in the same way.
Is the mass criminal activity we’re seeing in cities a foreign-funded effort to destabilize our politics, intimidate Americans to subvert the democratic process, and prevent the federal government from carrying out entirely justifiable immigration law enforcement? It’s hard to say definitively without further investigation. So long as these miscreants continue to act lawlessly, however, states and the federal government will have ample cause to open those investigations—to identify who is laying the groundwork for violence, which large nonprofits should face massive asset forfeitures for bankrolling civil terrorism, and which individuals should be facing prison time for bringing the new wave of organized crime to American streets.
Tal Fortgang is a legal policy fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
Top Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images
/ Donate
City Journal is a publication of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research (MI), a leading free-market think tank. Are you interested in supporting the magazine? As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, donations in support of MI and City Journal are fully tax-deductible as provided by law (EIN #13-2912529).
We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
City Journal Comment Policy
Topical and respectful comments are welcome. All comments will be held for pre-moderation.
0 Ratings
0.0
5
4
3
2
1
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
-
-
Related Articles
Read the whole story
bogorad
13 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Who Really is to Blame for Anti-Deportation Riots?

1 Share
  • Central Argument: Federal Judge James Boasberg is blamed for initiating anti-deportation riots through his rulings that hindered enforcement of the Alien Enemies Act.

  • Initial Ruling Impact: Judge Boasberg's swift actions, including an immediate ban on deportation of individuals covered by the AEA and an order to return already-departed planes, are seen as key in sparking the unrest.

  • Spread of Influence: Boasberg's status as chief judge and his connections are highlighted, suggesting his rulings emboldened other judges across the country to issue similar orders blocking deportations.

  • Consequence of Judicial Actions: The actions of these judges are presented as undermining the president's authority on immigration and national security, contributing to the current lawlessness and riots.

  • Specific Examples: The article cites specific cases where judges intervened to stop deportations, including a Venezuelan crime racket member, a man accused of trafficking, and relatives of an attempted firebomber, to illustrate the broader trend.


Discussion about this post

Well done, Julie K! It is pure insanity that US federal judge act to protect the so-called “rights” of illegal criminal aliens over US citizens!! And, all supported by the DemocRATic party!
Expand full comment
Great info, Julie!👍👍 I’m hopeful that the judges like Jimmy BoBo will be smacked down, though I fear the damage done by this lunatic and his fellow loons will last quite a while. They have damaged their own credibility, along with that of the broader judicial system. Any normal person with a shred of common sense understands the depravity of these judges, causing these normal people to be skeptical of the entire system.
This is on top of the persecution of political enemies pursued by whomever was in charge of the Biden administration. It’s springtime on the farm and that’s when an entire winter’s worth of manure must be removed. This feels like a particularly large pile of 🐂💩
Expand full comment
62 more comments...
Ready for more?
Read the whole story
bogorad
13 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Bill Ackman on X: "Some have criticized @RobertKennedyJr ACIP members appointments as being unqualified because they deem some to be ‘vaccine skeptics,’ a nomenclature they use, for example, to describe @MartinKulldorff. Kulldorff is a epidemiologist that co-authored the Great Barrington" / X

1 Share
  • Criticism: Some view ACIP member appointments, including Martin Kulldorff, as unqualified due to perceived 'vaccine skepticism.'

  • Great Barrington Declaration (GBD): Co-authored by Kulldorff, the GBD proposed focused protection for vulnearable during COVID-19 and normalcy for healthy individuals, which is now seen as a superior approach.

  • Vaccine Assessment: Vaccines have both benefits and risks, requiring careful weighing for different groups and ages.

  • ACIP Panel Composition: A panel with members willing to challenge conventional wisdom is more likely to reach accurate conclusions than one solely of 'vaccine enthusiasts.'

  • Vaccine Impact: Vaccines have saved many lives but also caused harm to some.


Some have criticized ACIP members appointments as being unqualified because they deem some to be ‘vaccine skeptics,’ a nomenclature they use, for example, to describe . Kulldorff is a epidemiologist that co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration that recommended focused protection for the most vulnerable and a return to normalcy for young healthy children and others in light of the vastly different risk of COVID to the young and healthy and the other health economic and societal risks to the then prevailing global lockdown approach in October 2020. The GBD was an extremely important contribution to the COVID discussion that was widely derided at the time, but in retrospect appears to have been a vastly superior approach to dealing with Covid. Like other drugs, vaccines offer benefits alongside risks that must be carefully weighed in order for a proper risk reward assessment to be made about their use in different populations, the age at which they are administered, and other relevant considerations. An ACIP panel that includes individuals who have shown a willingness to challenge conventional wisdom on vaccines and other health measures is more likely to get to the truth than one solely comprised of ‘vaccine enthusiasts.’ Vaccines have saved millions of lives, while also causing enormous harm to some. new ACIP panel can help advance our thinking on vaccine use and thereby help restore confidence that has been lost in our health institutions by an objective and careful review of vaccine policy. RFK is on the right track and he should be applauded for his efforts here.
Read the whole story
bogorad
13 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

New Army Reserve Unit Enlists Tech Executives From Meta, Palantir - WSJ

1 Share
  • New Army program: Silicon Valley tech executives are joining a new U.S. Army Reserve program focused on bringing tech upgrades.

  • Inaugural cohort: The first group includes chief technology officers from Palantir and Meta Platforms, along with OpenAI alumni.

  • Stated mission: The executives will serve part-time to assist the Army with technology advancements.

  • Shifting relationship: The program highlights a deepening relationship between the Pentagon and the tech industry.

  • Service commitment: Participants will serve about 120 hours per year as lieutenant colonels, with some flexibility in their duties.


Read the whole story
bogorad
13 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories