Strategic Initiatives
10700 stories
·
45 followers

Repeat After Us: This Is Not the Last Election

1 Share
Repeat After Us: This Is Not the Last Election
Donald Trump takes the stage for his last rally of the election on November 05, 2024, in Grand Rapids, Michigan. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla via Getty Images)

Is it really possible that this could be the last election in American history?

Ahead of today’s vote, that was the message issued by partisans on both sides. Joe Biden claimed for months that he was running to save American democracy from the ravages of Donald Trump, and late in her campaign, Kamala Harris said the same thing. Trump is a fascist, she said during a CNN town hall in late October. “I believe that Donald Trump is dangerous.”

Oprah Winfrey, speaking Monday evening at Kamala’s last rally in Philadelphia, said: “If we don’t show up tomorrow, it is entirely possible that we will not have the opportunity to cast a ballot again.” 

Read more

Read the whole story
bogorad
10 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

How Trump Won

1 Share
He was impeached, found guilty of sexual assault, faced nearly 100 indictments, and was convicted in a Manhattan court. None of it mattered. Here’s why Trump won.
Trump—the king of the meme—demonstrated a mastery of the political image, creating iconic visuals that defined him as a champion for half the country. (Evan Vucci via AP Photos)

What just happened? 

Donald Trump ended his first term in disgrace, hit with a second impeachment after his supporters stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The 2022 midterm candidates he endorsed—Herschel Walker, Mehmet Oz, Kari Lake—all went down in flames. In 2023, he was declared guilty of sexually assaulting the writer E. Jean Carroll in a civil case. This past May, he was convicted in a Manhattan court on 34 felony counts for improperly reporting hush money payments. Overall, he has faced 116 indictments. Even now, the New York State attorney general is trying to punish the Trump Organization with nearly $500 million in fines, claiming that he unlawfully inflated the value of his properties. 

And yet here he is: America’s 47th president. 

How did he do it? Trump led an insurgency of oddball outsiders against an insular band of out-of-touch elites. Kamala Harris had Beyoncé, Harvard economists, The New York Times, and the cast of Saturday Night Live. Trump had Elon Musk, Robert Kennedy Jr., Joe Rogan, and the Teamster rank and file. In a year when Americans were angry, this misfit coalition was a tribune for their rage. 

Why were Americans so angry?

Read more

Read the whole story
bogorad
10 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

‘We Blew It, Joe!’

1 Share
‘We Blew It, Joe!’
Supporters leave Howard University after Kamala Harris canceled an election night event in Washington, D.C., on November 6, 2024. (Angela Weiss via Getty Images)

The question is how the Ivy League technocrats with oodles of cash and all their allies in legacy media, Hollywood, and Silicon Valley managed to bungle this so royally.

How did Kamala Harris lose to a crook and his campaign of “relentless lying,” as CNN recently characterized it?

The answer is: It was not a campaign of relentless lying. Relentless bullshit, yes, as my colleague Eli Lake has noted. Relentless hyperbole, absolutely. But lying? That’s just not how voters saw it.

For the past eight years, the Republican Party has been having an honest conversation about the real things that ail us: inflation; the hollowing out of rural America; the rise of China; the housing crisis; the opioid crisis; the chaos at our southern border; free speech; and the decline of American power.

Read more

Read the whole story
bogorad
10 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

The arrival of the Barcelona tram to Verdaguer already has a date

1 Share

The inauguration of the new section of the tram on Avenida Diagonal, which runs from Plaza de las Glòries to Calle Girona, is getting closer and closer. This last phase, which will last until November 9, implies that trams will run without passengers, simulating the real service planned. With this, the testing period that began on July 15 is concluded, where the integration of the tram with other systems was checked: tracks, power supply, the innovative continuous ground supply system, stops, traffic lights, and the railway signaling system.

During these weeks of "blank run", trams will run at commercial speed, stopping at new stations to simulate passenger exchange. The goal is to perform the last checks and adjustments in terms of availability, reliability, and service safety. The first deputy mayor of Barcelona, Laia Bonet, highlighted the importance of the tram as part of the sustainable mobility model that is being promoted in the city. According to Bonet, "with these new two kilometers of tram, we connect Eixample with Sant Adrià and Badalona, while transforming Diagonal into a space that promotes sustainable mobility, with a new bike lane and wider and greener sidewalks." Bonet emphasized that this transformation will also favor commerce and economic activity in the area.

On the other hand, Manel Nadal, Secretary of Mobility and Infrastructure of the Generalitat, valued the commitment of the Catalan government to the tram as a high-capacity and sustainable means of transportation. In addition, he emphasized the importance of continuing with the second phase of the project to connect the tram along Diagonal.

With the start of this phase, important changes have been implemented in the operation of tram lines T4, T5, and T6. Line T4 will now operate on the Glòries to Verdaguer section, leaving Ciutadella-Vila Olímpica, which will be covered by lines T5 and T6. Users of line T4 who want to continue to Ciutadella will have to make a transfer at Glòries to the other two lines. The operator TRAM has been informing users of these changes through posters and staff at stops.

During this last phase, trams will begin to run on the new infrastructure, although the Monumental, Sicilia, and Verdaguer stops will remain closed to prevent user access. In addition, the warning signs for the passage of trams in testing will be maintained. The Barcelona City Council has also made adjustments to the traffic light regulation in the new section to prioritize tram passage, adjusting the cycles in 27 intersections, 10 of them on Avenida Diagonal and 17 in adjacent streets. In Plaza de las Glòries, 10 new pedestrian crossings with traffic lights have been installed, including acoustic devices for the visually impaired.

The reurbanization of Avenida Diagonal has been one of the most outstanding projects of the summer in Barcelona. This intervention has significantly expanded the sidewalks, gaining 17,290 square meters of space for pedestrians, and has improved the sustainable mobility infrastructure. The bike lane has been redesigned, giving it greater width and separating it from pedestrian traffic. In total, 5,040 square meters of new bike lane have been implemented along 1.6 kilometers of the avenue. In addition, green areas have been added and 266 new trees have been planted, which will contribute to improving the environmental quality of the area.

The new tram section, which will run for about two kilometers, will connect Glòries and Verdaguer, and it is expected to absorb 24,000 new daily trips, eliminating approximately 2,000 cars from the central section of Diagonal. This infrastructure will also connect with four metro lines (L1, L2, L4, and L5) and 13 TMB bus lines, significantly improving intermodality in the city.

Finally, the new continuous ground supply system (APS) will allow trams to operate without the need for catenaries, through a third rail that will feed the vehicles exclusively as they pass. This technology, pioneering in Spain and one of the first in the world to be adapted to an already operating fleet, will be a step forward in the modernization of public transportation in Barcelona. With its implementation, the tram is set to become a key pillar in the city's sustainable mobility.



Read the whole story
bogorad
1 day ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Barcelona withdraws from a new Copa America after the controversy over the cost

1 Share

The Barcelona City Council has decided not to host the Copa América in 2026. This was confirmed by Jordi Valls, deputy mayor of Economy, although he highlighted the positive legacy that the event has left in the city. Valls pointed out that extending the celebration of the same until 2026 would not bring anything relevant. "It doesn't make sense to make a new investment of public resources," he said. In a subsequent appearance before the media, Valls recalled that the Copa América was thought exclusively for the period 2020-2024, so continuing beyond that is not logical.

Valls added that "Barcelona is very attractive, it's a global city with other options," referring to the fact that now the focus will be on events such as the Tour de France or the world capital of architecture. The deputy mayor also assured that the disconnection with the organizers of the event has been friendly, and both have fulfilled their objectives.

The Team New Zealand, winner of the 37th edition and responsible for deciding the venue of the next edition, confirmed in a statement that they wish to expand the competition, but find difficulties in doing so due to the space limitations in Barcelona.

Among the various administrations, 54 million euros were allocated to the Copa América, 10 million of which came from the City Council. Despite not continuing with the event, Valls positively valued the impact it has had on the city, highlighting the investments in the coastal area and the reinforcement of Barcelona's international image. The test attracted 2.5 million visitors, although the data on television audience of the regattas are not yet available.

On the other hand, the No to the Copa América platform celebrated the decision not to repeat the event in 2026, qualifying it as an "elitist competition" that represented a huge public expense and generated little interest in the citizenry. In their statement, they expressed their satisfaction, pointing out that it was a "popular and neighborhood victory" against city models based on macro-events and tourist exploitation.

Furthermore, the platform demands an exhaustive and transparent audit to evaluate the real economic, social and environmental impacts that the competition has had on the city.



Read the whole story
bogorad
1 day ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

No on Proposition 1

1 Share

On November 5, New Yorkers will be asked to vote on Proposition 1, the New York Equal Rights Amendment. New Yorkers for Equal Rights, a progressive group supporting the measure, claims that the purpose of the amendment is to codify a right to abortion in the state constitution.

But to state the obvious, abortion is not under threat in liberal New York. And Prop. 1 does not even include the word “abortion” anywhere in its language.

The real purpose of New York’s Equal Rights Amendment is, among other progressive ambitions, to legalize “reverse discrimination”—that is, discrimination against certain racial groups in an effort to help others. In particular, Paragraph B of the amendment states: “Nothing in this section shall invalidate or prevent the adoption of any law, regulation, program, or practice that is designed to prevent or dismantle discrimination on the basis of a characteristic listed in this section.”

The last time that New York officials tried to “dismantle discrimination,” Asian American kids bore the burden.

In June 2018, New York City mayor Bill de Blasio and schools chancellor Richard Carranza announced a plan to change the city’s Discovery program, designed to increase the number of low-income students enrolled at Gotham’s specialized high schools (SHSs). Like many other New York progressives, de Blasio and Carranza took issue with the low number of black and Latino students and, implicitly, with the high number of Asian students enrolled in these institutions. “I just don’t buy into the narrative that any one ethnic group own’s admission to these schools,” said Carranza at the time.

To qualify for admission to a specialized high school under Discovery before 2018, a student had to get a certain score on the Specialized High School Admissions Test; be certified by her middle school as disadvantaged and having high potential; and complete a summer preparatory program. But under the 2018 plan, only students attending middle schools with an “Economic Need Index” of 60 percent or higher would be eligible for admission through the program.

In a lawsuit, the Chinese American Citizens Alliance of Greater New York, represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation, projected that students attending 11 of New York City’s 24 majority-Asian middle schools would lose eligibility, compared with just 20 of the 191 majority-black schools and nine of the 243 majority-Latino schools. The new Discovery criteria, which have endured under Mayor Eric Adams, penalize Asian American students in order to help those who are black and Latino. It “operates to limit Discovery not to poor students, but to poor students at particular schools,” the suit explains.

In September, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in CACAGNY’s favor after almost seven years of litigation. The Second Circuit reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of New York City and concluded that the de Blasio-Carranza Discovery Program had a discriminatory effect on Asian American students. “Here, it is undisputed that economically disadvantaged Asian-American students from certain middle schools, who would have been eligible for admission to the SHSs under the prior admission policy for the Discovery Program, were rendered ineligible for admission under the new policy because the Economic Need Index . . . at their middle school was too high,” wrote Circuit Judge Joseph Bianco.

Prop. 1 remains dangerous even after the Second Circuit’s ruling. If city officials get more creative in crafting policies that discriminate against certain racial groups in order to help others, the amendment will not protect those harmed, despite its proponents’ claim that it would further “equal rights.” Rather, the measure, if passed, could be used to discriminate against Asian Americans and any other racially unfavored group. All New Yorkers who care about equal rights in the true sense of the term should vote “no” on Prop. 1.

Photo: tap10 / iStock / Getty Images Plus

Donate

City Journal is a publication of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research (MI), a leading free-market think tank. Are you interested in supporting the magazine? As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, donations in support of MI and City Journal are fully tax-deductible as provided by law (EIN #13-2912529).

Read the whole story
bogorad
1 day ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories